Camus' views are so absolutely hopeless that he even criticizes Franz Kafka, another writer in the genre, for his allowing hope to creep in through the crevices of his short stories. Through this allegory, Camus raises questions about love and the purpose of romance, religion and the afterlife, work and toil, essence, meaning, purpose, design-all within a bleak, hopeless narrative about human life. He does this every day in the darkness of the underworld, seperated from the natural world which provided him comfort and solice. He tells the story in a way that is relatable to his argument, in that he frames Sisyphus' main struggle to be against the hopelessness of his situation, namely that he is forced to push a stone up a hill just to watch it roll back down again. The Greek account of Sisyphus is found in Homer and other ancient writers, but Camus retells the story highlighting a certain narrative. One who lives bravely despite the hopelessness of his condition is what Camus defines in this work as an absurd hero. His argument within his existential worldview is that man can learn the truth about the meaninglessness of life, or its absurdity, and still lead a brave, rewarding life in spite of that fact. That is, Camus argues that life has no inherent goal or aim, no validating quality in its function. The book is a philosophical essay in four parts, "An Absurd Reasoning," "The Absurd Man," "Absurd Creation," and "The Myth of Sisyphus." Arguments in the work are mainly existential, meaning that they deal with the meaning of life in the context of a nihilistic or else atheistic worldview. We are thankful for their contributions and encourage you to make your own.Īlbert Camus published The Myth of Sisyphus in 1942 in French which was translated first into English by Just O'Brien in 1955. These notes were contributed by members of the GradeSaver community.
0 kommentar(er)
